Posts tagged Tovar v. Essentia Health.
Blogs
5 minute read
Employers and health plans should be aware that two recent federal decisions have recognized that the non-discrimination provision in the Affordable Care Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity. Plans cannot categorically exclude coverage for procedures to treat gender dysphoria.
In Boyden v. Conlin, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin found that the state’s exclusion of gender reassignment-related procedures from the state employees’ health insurance coverage constitutes sex discrimination in violation of Section 1557 ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Navigating the Legal Risks of Consumer Protection Claims in Healthcare
- Oregon SB 951, Regulating the Corporate Practice of Medicine, Is Signed Into Law—But Changes May Be in the Works Already
- CMS Doubles Down on Medicare Advantage Recoupment: Announces Aggressive RADV Strategy to Reclaim Billions
- HealthBench: Advancing the Standard for Evaluating AI in Health Care
- What Health Care Lawyers and Professionals Need to Know About Emerging Employee Benefit Issues